Asunto(s)
Arterias Bronquiales/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/terapia , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prueba de COVID-19 , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background Recent literature reports a strong thrombotic tendency in patients hospitalized for a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This characteristic is unusual and seems specific to COVID-19 infections, especially in their severe form. Viral infections can trigger acquired thrombophilia, which can then lead to thrombotic complications. We investigate for the presence of acquired thrombophilia, which could participate in this phenomenon, and report its prevalence. We also wonder if these thrombophilias participate in the bad prognosis of severe COVID-19 infections. Methods and Results In 89 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, we found a 20% prevalence of PS (protein S) deficiency and a high (ie, 72%) prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies: mainly lupus anticoagulant. The presence of PS deficiency or antiphospholipid antibodies was not linked with a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time nor with D-dimer, fibrinogen, or CRP (C-reactive protein) concentrations. These coagulation abnormalities are also not linked with thrombotic clinical events occurring during hospitalization nor with mortality. Conclusions We assess a high prevalence of positive tests detecting thrombophilia in COVID-19 infections. However, in our series, these acquired thrombophilias are not correlated with the severity of the disease nor with the occurrence of thrombotic events. Albeit the strong thrombotic tendency in COVID-19 infections, the presence of frequent acquired thrombophilia may be part of the inflammation storm of COVID-19 and should not systematically modify our strategy on prophylactic anticoagulant treatment, which is already revised upwards in this pathological condition. Registration URL: https://www.cliniâcaltrâials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04335162.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Deficiencia de Proteína S/epidemiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Proteína S/análisis , Deficiencia de Proteína S/sangre , Deficiencia de Proteína S/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trombosis/sangre , Trombosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The world is currently facing an unprecedented healthcare crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of these guidelines is to produce a framework to facilitate the partial and gradual resumption of intervention activity in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The group has endeavoured to produce a minimum number of recommendations to highlight the strengths to be retained in the 7 predefined areas: (1) protection of staff and patients; (2) benefit/risk and patient information; (3) preoperative assessment and decision on intervention; (4) modalities of the preanaesthesia consultation; (5) specificity of anaesthesia and analgesia; (6) dedicated circuits and (7) containment exit type of interventions. RESULTS: The SFAR Guideline panel provides 51 statements on anaesthesia management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. After one round of discussion and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached for 100% of the recommendations and algorithms. CONCLUSION: We present suggestions for how the risk of transmission by and to anaesthetists can be minimised and how personal protective equipment policies relate to COVID-19 pandemic context.